In my previous newsletter, I mentioned that something had to give regarding the escalating tariff situation. Heading into last Thursday, I expected the markets to rally on news of reasonable, reciprocal trade terms. Instead, we got the opposite—continued uncertainty and no clear path to resolution. And as we know, markets can handle bad news, but what they truly despise is uncertainty.
Case in point: Vietnam was hit with a 49% tariff, but the very next day, they offered to eliminate their tariffs entirely if we did the same. That indicated a willingness to compromise. However, Peter Navarro, a key economic advisor, rejected the idea outright, insisting he wasn’t interested in compromise—he wanted jobs brought back to the U.S.
The reality is, those jobs are not coming back. According to a recent Bank of America report, if we manufactured something like the iPhone domestically, the price would skyrocket from $1,000 to over $2,500. It’s simply not economically viable.
Navarro’s prominent media presence and hardline stance have understandably spooked both foreign governments and investors. Over the weekend, criticism mounted. Warren Buffett likened the tariff approach to an act of war. Elon Musk went a step further, calling Navarro “as dumb as a sack of bricks,” then humorously apologizing—to the sack of bricks.
The result? The market experienced its worst three-day drop since 1987.
Why was I optimistic that this wouldn’t last? History. Nearly a century ago, the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act under President Hoover triggered a global trade war that deepened the Great Depression and kept Republicans out of congressional power for nearly five decades.
Investors fear a repeat. Without signs of negotiation, the risk of a recession becomes more tangible—especially as earnings season approaches. Companies like Walmart or Nike may be forced to withdraw guidance due to tariff uncertainty, potentially triggering a self-fulfilling downward spiral.
Fortunately, today the administration announced a 90-day extension for negotiations. The market responded with strong gains. If these discussions lead to meaningful tariff reductions, it could be a significant win for global markets and economic stability.
However, the wildcard remains Peter Navarro. If his influence grows again, we could see renewed volatility. One analyst even described him as “Trump’s useful idiot”—provocative enough to push other countries toward making deals with the administration. Crude as that may sound, it might reflect a strategic, albeit risky, play.
I’ll continue monitoring developments and will update you as things evolve. While the past week has been turbulent, there is cautious optimism that cooler heads may ultimately prevail.
—
Disclosures:
- The opinions expressed are for general informational purposes only and are not intended as specific investment advice.
- Past performance is not indicative of future results.
- All investments involve risk, including possible loss of principal.
- Economic forecasts and projections are not guaranteed and may not develop as predicted.
- The S&P 500 Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of 500 leading publicly traded companies in the U.S. and is widely considered a benchmark for the overall U.S. stock market.
Mike Frost
Frost Financial Group
This material is for informational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal.
Investors cannot invest directly in indexes. The performance of any index is not indicative of the performance of any investment and does not take into account the effects of inflation and the fees and expenses associated with investing.